“Client charge with O.A.S. (Subsequent Offense). Client rejects State’s plea offer and opts for trial. At trial the defense questions the State’s witnesses (two State Troopers) regarding the client’s certified motor vehicle, which appeared to show that the client’s license was valid on the date the State says it was under suspension. In closing arguments, the defense points out to the judge State’s failure to provide available motor vehicle records regarding client’s suspension. Further, the defense points out to the judge that the criminal complaint against the client is defective in that it failed to allege a material element of the offense of O.A.S. (Subsequent Offense). Judge finds client NOT GUILTY.”